Log in

Review Detail

 
Russian Bombers Fly Near Alaskan Coast for Second Day in a Row
Conservative News
by Breaking    

President trump, along with a new class of Battleship, you should look into building Valkyrie bombers. If this craft were updated, we would have a formidable answer to Russia. The Valkyrie can hit speeds of Mach 3+

Was this review helpful to you? 

Comments

2 results - showing 1 - 2  
 
Ordering 
 
2 results - showing 1 - 2  
 
 

Comments

2 results - showing 1 - 2  
 
Ordering 
 
Roberto Benitez Written by Roberto Benitez
April 24, 2017
Battleships are too unwieldly and require large armadas to protect them. Their vulnerability was show during WWII. What we need is littoral ships capable of 45+ knots.

The Soviets built fighters like the Foxbat to engage both the SR-71s and the B-70s had they gone into service. What's needed is a stealthy hypersonic (Mach 8+) sub orbital aircraft like the alleged "Aurora" but as a bomber that can launch long range standoff missiles. We could also use a more conventional bomber that could carry multiple MOABs.
In reply to an earlier comment

Timothy Linnomme Written by Timothy Linnomme
April 24, 2017
The BB would be part of an AC Fleet. Our AC unit are severely vulnerable to modern missile tecgh while modern armor tech at BB grade would be protected from the aforementioned. 16 Inch shells can't be jammed either. The Montana Class BB would have 12 16 inch guns and four 18-24 inch guns for guided munitions. one plunging shell from a BB would turn a Battlecruiser into a slag heap.

The Valkyrie not only can do Mach 3+, it could be outfitted with an LBA (Laser Battery Array) and graphene based composite armor. We have the technology and it is time to put it to use.
2 results - showing 1 - 2  
 
 

63°F

New York

Sunny

Humidity: 66%

Wind: 11 mph

  • 28 Jun 2017 80°F 61°F
  • 29 Jun 2017 83°F 66°F
Don't Forget To Like BlabberBuzz