Disney’s Cost-Cutting Drive Slams Into FCC Rules—And Jimmy Kimmel Is Caught In The Middle

By Alan Hume | Sunday, 13 September 2026 02:45 AM
Views 2.5K
Image Credit : Screenshot captured srcdn.com

Jimmy Kimmel’s future on ABC appears to hinge not on ratings or relevance, but on whether he is willing to slash the cost of producing his late-night show.

According to Western Journal, Kimmel is in negotiations with Disney-owned ABC to extend his contract beyond its May expiration, but the talks are reportedly conditioned on a significant budget reduction for “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” or the show could face the same fate as Stephen Colbert’s program. CBS pulled the plug on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” last fall after the production, believed to cost about $100 million annually, was reportedly losing around $40 million a year.

Similarly, Puck News reported Friday that “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” carries a comparable price tag, costing about $100 million per year to produce, raising questions about whether the network can justify such an expense in a shrinking late-night market. “But while Kimmel’s show is said to generate more overall revenue than the older-skewing and less digitally savvy Colbert, the numbers still aren’t great. The late night shows on ABC, CBS, and NBC together lured just $221 million in ad revenue in 2024, about half the $439 million generated in 2018,” Puck said.

 KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE RESIGNED BUT THE ALLEGATIONS DON'T END THEREbell_image

Kimmel’s audience numbers, while solid by today’s diminished standards, are hardly overwhelming given the cost structure attached to his show. He averaged 2.51 million viewers per night last season, compared to Colbert’s 2.88 million, according to The Hollywood Reporter, underscoring that even the top-tier late-night brands are no longer the cultural juggernauts they once were.

 THE SUPREME COURT WILL DECIDE IF A NIGERIAN TERROR GROUP’S COOK GETS ASYLUMbell_image

Deadline reported on Friday that Kimmel and Disney are actively discussing a contract renewal, but the network’s financial priorities are clearly shifting. “The wrinkle? ABC is reportedly keen to cut the budget of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, a move that is becoming increasingly commonplace in late-night television.”

 TALARICO HOPES A NEW PAXTON STORY WILL BURY HIS 13-DAY DISAPPEARANCEbell_image

The pressure on Kimmel is part of a broader cost-cutting drive at Disney, which has been trimming staff and expenses across multiple divisions while still pushing a progressive cultural agenda on air. “Disney is keen to make cuts across the board. In August, Deadline broke the news that Disney was offering longtime executives early retirement. This came after it started rounds of layoffs, first announced in April, with the elimination of 1,000 jobs with more cuts coming in July, particularly on the Pixar and Nat Geo fronts,” the outlet said.

 EL-SAYED'S CAMPAIGN IS NOW RESPONDING TO HIS SISTER’S POSTS —BRACE FOR IT!bell_image

Puck suggested that Kimmel’s show could be forced to scale back its footprint in ways that would be noticeable to viewers and staff alike. Possible measures include eliminating “weeks of production or go to full reruns for the summer, eliminating two months of guest-hosted shows.”

 ELIZABETH WARREN IS BACK TO REVIVE ‘ELECTION INTERFERENCE’ CLAIMS WEEKS BEFORE VOTEbell_image

The outlet further outlined more drastic options that would hit the show’s creative core and signature spectacles. “He could cut writers, producers, or other staff. Or nix the more costly stunts, like taping a week of shows in Brooklyn, which ABC okayed again for this fall. Kimmel could also shave more off his own fee, which has been reported at $15 million a year.”

 SIX FLAGS SHUTS DOWN CALIFORNIA GOLIATH AFTER MAN IS THROWN FROM TWIN COASTER IN GEORGIAbell_image

Colbert, whose show was ultimately canceled, was also reportedly making $15 million per year, highlighting how top-tier talent salaries have become a glaring line item in an era of declining ad revenue. Puck added, “Or, if they can’t make a deal, ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ could end after 24 years. Kalshi, the prediction market, has it as a 9 percent chance Kimmel will be ‘fired’ before the end of the year.”

 SHUT DOWN SANCTUARY POLICIES ACT ADVANCES AFTER DEADLY CASES—AND PUTS BLUE STATES ON NOTICEbell_image

Beyond the financial pressures, politics appears to be a major factor in Kimmel’s desire to stay on the air, as his show has become a reliable platform for left-wing commentary and anti-Trump rhetoric. Puck speculated that Kimmel does not want to leave before the end of Trump’s presidency in 2028.

 KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE CONFIRMS EXIT AS U.S. AMBASSADOR TO GREECE AFTER WHITE HOUSE RESIGNATION REQUESTbell_image

“And now that Colbert is off TV, sources say that Kimmel feels a bit of a responsibility to carry the torch as late night’s thorn in the president’s side,” the news outlet said, underscoring how openly partisan late-night television has become. That posture has increasingly put Kimmel and ABC on a collision course with federal broadcast rules that were written to prevent exactly this kind of one-sided political use of the public airwaves.

 BILL MAHER SAYS HE FEELS FREER TALKING TO TRUMP THAN OBAMA OR CLINTON—AND BLAMES DEMOCRATS FOR ITbell_image

In January, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr reminded ABC that programs like “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” and “The View” are subject to “equal time” rules when they feature political candidates, because broadcast networks such as ABC, CBS, and NBC operate under a different legal framework than cable or streaming platforms. “For years, legacy TV networks assumed that their late-night & daytime talk shows qualify as ‘bona fide news’ programs — even when motivated by purely partisan political purposes,” Carr posted in January on social media.

 THE MONOLOGUE GILLIS DELIVERED ON SNL HAS WOKE CELEBRITIES FURIOUSbell_image

“Today, the FCC reminded them of their obligation to provide all candidates with equal opportunities.” The networks’ traditional news broadcasts are exempt from equal time laws, but entertainment-style political programming is not, which complicates efforts by liberal hosts to use these shows as campaign platforms while shutting out opposing voices.

 FORMER DETROIT DEMOCRATS TURN ON ABDUL EL-SAYED IN MIKE ROGERS AD—AND THEIR WARNING IS BRUTALbell_image

Kimmel himself recently demonstrated how little appetite he has for that kind of balance when he used his Wednesday opening monologue to complain that he could not air his interview with Texas Democrat U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico on ABC this week because of Trump. Instead, he would be posting it to YouTube, a platform not bound by the same equal time requirements that govern broadcast television.

 'THE VIEW' HOSTS DEFEND TALARICO AND LABEL REPUBLICAN TALK 'CONSPIRACY THEORIES' (VIDEO)bell_image

The late-night host apparently does not want to comply with the network’s legal obligation by offering Republican Ken Paxton an equivalent opportunity to appear on the show. Rather than adjust his partisan format to meet the law, Kimmel appears more inclined to shift political content off the regulated airwaves and onto digital platforms where he can continue attacking conservatives without the inconvenience of equal access.

 THE MAN ICE SHOT IN NEW YORK HAS A RECORD — A FORMER NEIGHBOR CALLED HIM A 'MACHETE-WIELDING MENACE'bell_image

Last month, Disney escalated the confrontation by filing a lawsuit against the FCC, claiming that the Trump administration is infringing on ABC’s freedom of speech, a familiar tactic from media corporations that want the benefits of public broadcast licenses without the corresponding responsibilities. Carr has countered that he is merely enforcing the law regarding broadcast stations, insisting that the rules apply regardless of which party occupies the White House.

 NEW YORK MAYOR’S COLUMBUS DAY NO-SHOW SPARKS CHEERS, OUTRAGE—AND A WARNING FROM ITALIAN AMERICAN LEADERSbell_image

As Kimmel weighs a pay cut, staff reductions, and scaled-back production against his desire to remain “late night’s thorn in the president’s side,” the broader question is whether viewers and advertisers will continue to subsidize a highly partisan show at a nine-figure annual cost. With ad revenue collapsing, Disney tightening its belt, and federal regulators finally pressing legacy networks to play fair when they dabble in electoral politics, “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” now stands at the intersection of economics, law, and ideology—and the host may soon discover that the marketplace and the rule of law are less forgiving than his studio audience.

X